Monday, 10 November 2014

Dr M. Kabir az-Zubair's View

Firstly, I'm not an RE teacher. My interest in participating in this discourse is driven mainly by my concern, on one hand, as a parent, and an educationist with interests in religious and moral education of children in British schools, on the other.

I made the argument that, replacing the standard RE curriculum with, or in combination, philosophy is a good thing; given the wider scope of philosophical ideas and concepts. However, I added a caveat, that the philosophical materials to be used in this regard must recognise some key issues: the diversity of our society, with attendant differences in moral and ethical norms; the need to educate our children to understand the complexity of the society of which they are part, but most importantly, imbibing them with sufficiently broad moral framework with which to engage the interdependent world they live in. 

The world is faced with rising violence, some of which are based on misunderstanding of religion, or promoted by historical religious grievances, or ethnic/faith identity conflicts and so on. It's necessary, therefore, that the philosophy is a combination of the Western and Eastern variety, including Islamic philosophy. This will actually attenuate the virulence of the hate mongers and radical religious preachers brainwashing the youths with a death wish. A balanced philosophy training will enable the children maintain a dignified differences of views where the prevailing norm does not agree with their respective faiths. A better understanding of where each group, believing and non-believing alike, is coming from will go far in promoting tolerance and mutual respect. Naturally, each component should be taught by those competent within the faith, as opposed to having someone with an entirely different worldview teaching materials which s/he doesn't fully understand.

Dr M. Kabir az-Zubair

Recommendations to improve the proposal for a new A Level

Bob's second post:

My proposal is based on my analysis that the ethics component is really weak (see my earlier blog) indeed in the second section. It is weaker than philosophy of religion at AS and much weaker at the full A Level. The “Philosophical, Ethical and Social Scientific Studies of Religion” section at the moment is much less well developed than equivalent bullets in the other two areas. The whole section feels lighter than the others in demand and coherence.

Gerry's Understanding of the Outline

Gerry Cohen outlines his view of the new GCSE criteria.

Download <here>

Sunday, 9 November 2014

The end of ethics in Religious Studies A Level?

Dr Bob Bowie, Principal Lecturer at Canterbury Christ Church University and author of Ethical Studies (www.ethicalstudies.co.uk)

The government has announced a consultation on the revised A Level and GCSE guidance for examinations boards. The consultation period ends 29th December 2014. 

A striking feature of this proposal is the downgrading of the systematic study of ethics from the options available. For over twenty years, the English curriculum authorities have made it possible to study moral philosophy, ethical theory and application, as half of Religious Studies at 16-19 level. It has been one subject among many others, which have included sacred texts studies, theology, and studies in a number of specific religions. However, ethics has been far and away the most popular by all accounts....

Read full response here: http://ethicalstudies.co.uk/?p=188

Saturday, 8 November 2014

Chris' View

I am still trying to visualise what the changes yesterday to GCSE and A level might mean for my students from 2016 and note this will be from September 2015 if you do GCSE over 3 years!

There is evidence that the current GCSE isn't working and I put my hands up here that we are teaching to the test. The positives from the new criteria is it broader with more emphasis on 'traditional' aspects of Theology and Religious Studies. I love the fact there is more depth, diversity, rigour, synoptic links and contextualisation of religion. Tim Oates says “students study fewer things in greater depth so they really master fundamental concepts in a subject.” I agree, this has to be a positive step forward, you certainly cannot 'cherry pick' your religion or course anymore! It also goes without saying that two or more religions have to be included to reflect our diverse and multicultural society in the UK. Further, the progression and relationship between GCSE and A level will enable students to be stretched and challenged and I believe prepare students with a broader education for University courses in both TRS and P&E. Ultimately, it will enable better RE teachers, isn't this what we all want?

However, the questions and challenges for us are a school are: What will some of my weak GCSE students study now? Having 320 students who take RE through a Philosophy and Ethics course in Year 9 and finish the course in Year 10 in one hour a week, can we realistically teach this course? What will happen to our good results? Will we have to be more selective about who we enter? Will this mean an increase in the students who do Entry Level for our bottom sets? Will I need to approach my Head teacher about getting more time for GCSE RS? Is the only way we can teach this new criteria effectively through an option subject in 2 hours plus a week? Is this a good move for core RE in the UK? Where is the inclusion of animal rights/planet earth/medical ethics in this criteria? 

I am still taking in and processing all the change and whilst I don’t have the answers yet, I know what we all need to do to have our voices heard whilst this is a consultation document. #savere, please!

Chris Giles (Head of RE - South Bromsgrove High School) @sbhsrs 

Jason's View

I like the new spec from what I can see, I've recently become a little frustrated with how RE is taught in GCSE.
Quite often it seems religious believers are portrayed as these strange units that hold lots of eclectic beliefs that seem to have not impact on one another. Instead of passionate, intelligent people trying to commune with God. 

And sadly the major cause, in my mind, for this has been due to the large number of non-specialist teachers who find themselves teaching RE - often because they have a lesson free on their time-table. By adapting the course material to suit the knowledge base of the teachers teaching it, which does make sense don't get me wrong, we have unintentionally diluted religious beliefs to - a quote here and there. 

I am a specialist RE teacher and my degree in is Christian Applied Theology and so I am very well versed in using the Bible as a tool for teaching, I can cite Bible passages and cross reference them. But even I know I would struggle having to do the same for a different religion other than Christianity and I already have existing subject knowledge. This is why I do really sympathise with non-specialist - as I read the requirements for the new spec to be more focused on textual knowledge and theology - both of which are not something one can just 'pick up'.

My suggestion, which I know wouldn't be a normal response for any other subject, is for the government or another group to produce a subject knowledge booklet based on the new scheme - aimed at non-specialist teachers and other groups need to provide subject knowledge teaching for teachers too. As long as we have teachers whose subject knowledge is only slightly more than the students they are teaching then we're never going to move RE to the 'rigourous' and academic position it actually deserves. 

Presently, I am happy with the suggested changes and believe they will positive for RE and they students. 

Jason Wood (RE Teacher - Abbot Beyne High School).

First Reactions: @RECoELincoln

Gillian collected her first tweets into a Storify: https://storify.com/GillianGeorgiou/gcse-as-a-level-re-consultation-reconsult

Press Cuttings: What are the papers saying?

Academies Weekly: http://academiesweek.co.uk/new-gcse-re-criteria-require-students-to-study-two-religions-but-not-worldviews/






Friday, 7 November 2014

Candle Conferences

"As many of you will have seen, the consultation documents on the content and assessment strategies for reformed GCSE and A Level Religious Studies have finally been released this morning.  They can be read here and here.
These documents have long been anticipated and (perhaps unsurprisingly given their levels of involvement) have been warmly welcomed by faith-groups, by NATRE and the REC.
We welcome the Ofqual document and feel that it has the potential to make a real difference to the quality of teaching, learning and assessment in our subject, however, looking beyond the headlines, it seems to us that the impact of the DfE consultation on revised subject content could be momentous and, quite possibly, far from positive..."

Welcome: #REconsult #BlogSync

Image courtesy of Amazed and Confused

Friday 7th November saw the launch of the new GCSE and A-Level criteria for Religious Studies. The consultation documents are found here:

https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/gcse-and-a-level-reform-religious-studies
https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/religious-studies-gcses-as-and-a-levels-new-qualifications-for-2016

Given the number of RE teachers and other interested parties now using blogs, Twitter (#REconsult) and Facebook ("Save RE" group), it is entirely possible this will be the most debated, and hopefully responded to, consultation in the history of RE.

This BlogSync has been set up to create a  public forum for responses. It will enable people to read a variety of different responses, and comment appropriately (any disrespectful or personal comments will be removed). It will be shared with the DfE and Ofqual.

I urge every single teacher to read the documents carefully and respond. Highlight what you like about it, point out what is good,  suggest improvements and detail things you don't agree with. This is your chance!

Please consider blogging your response so it can be shared here. 

If you already have a blog, please email the URL of your post(s) to: TalkingDonkeyRE@gmail.com

If you don't have a blog, simply write your response and when emailing to RSGCSEandAlevel.CONSULTATION@education.gsi.gov.uk copy in TalkingDonkeyRE@gmail.com - if you would like to be identified, please include relevant info.

Thank you for considering getting involved,
Andy
@iteachre
www.MrLewisRE.co.uk